Opinions: because I know you have them.
Jul. 6th, 2011 02:36 pmAs you might've detected in my last post, I was rather iffy on the logo/watermark thing I used for the photos I posted. It was cute, but I didn't quite love it. (
archmage, you hit the nail on the head as to why, heh) I did like the type manipulation I did on the "creative", but the rest didn't feel very Me-ish. I *can* do detailed illustration, but strong, clean design is much more my signature.
So, I wound up spending several hours yesterday futzing with a new logo, and then made further tweaks earlier today. Now, I have two options:

Judgmental thumbs? Leanings one way or the other? The "SG" will be used by itself as a mark, in some instances, in case that impacts your decision. Detailed feedback is nice, but even "I like this one better for no good reason," is helpful, heh.
(FWIW, I like the look of the left option better because it feels more like a cohesive unit, but the one on the right more obviously implies the arrow/direction concept)
So, I wound up spending several hours yesterday futzing with a new logo, and then made further tweaks earlier today. Now, I have two options:
Judgmental thumbs? Leanings one way or the other? The "SG" will be used by itself as a mark, in some instances, in case that impacts your decision. Detailed feedback is nice, but even "I like this one better for no good reason," is helpful, heh.
(FWIW, I like the look of the left option better because it feels more like a cohesive unit, but the one on the right more obviously implies the arrow/direction concept)
no subject
Date: 2011-07-06 09:38 pm (UTC)I can't see the new ones for some reason
no subject
Date: 2011-07-06 09:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-06 09:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-06 10:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-07 06:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-06 10:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-06 10:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-07 01:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-07 02:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-06 11:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-07 12:08 am (UTC)Honestly, I don't get the arrow. I mean, I get what you're trying to say - I think - but only because you spelled it out for me. Otherwise I'd be thinking "huh, why is there an arrow there?" Maybe making the logo emphasize the arrow more would communicate the message better? Or at least make the arrow look like a more deliberate part of the design?
Of course, if you did that, the "G" might end up looking more like a masculine symbol, which is probably not what you want...
Eh. Wish I could offer more help. Logos are a bitch.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-07 12:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-07 12:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-07 12:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-07 04:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-07 05:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-07 08:56 pm (UTC)*note... this is actually a snarky vote for the one on the right.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-10 03:47 am (UTC)